Home Hotbox Blogs

RSS Feeds

Hotbox Magazine on Facebook

hotbox :: blogs

The DingoSphere

Exploring INTERIORSPACE, one voxel at a time.
Nov 13
2009

Performance Enhancer

Posted by Chip Dingo in Untagged 

Chip Dingo

Check out this funny youtube animation, the story of a psychedelic pitcher. Who needs steroids?

 


Discuss (5 posts)
Re:Performance Enhancer
Nov 15 2009 22:12:31
Damn dude. That's awesome. And hilarious.
#114
ckDrxrAwwiJXAy
Oct 12 2010 16:26:51
5OH7Qv <a href="mezcpjxyyire.com/">mezcpjxyyire</a>, lukqqsbqefbr, [link=http://biajczaqtxdf.com/]biajczaqtxdf[/link], gqgfnycxuukq.com/
#136
RQXtNCLaxL
Oct 21 2010 00:11:04
#190
OjtYzSRUDCQTe
Oct 21 2010 01:06:04
#192
WSIcQWKKjtSdzMblW
Oct 24 2010 23:54:21
#206

You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss...
May 01
2009

Laser Brain

Posted by Chip Dingo in Untagged 

Chip Dingo

And now for a topic a little closer to my heart:  Lasers. The always-terrifying Wired had a write-up a few days ago about a new technology that sounds just swell, the laser-controlled man.

 The essential idea is that by introducting a very  carefully-constructed virus into a person's brain, scientists of the future may be able to mark off neurons they want to activate by dumping a genetic payload that causes light-activated ion gates to form. Since ions are how a neuron shoots signals, this in theory gives the well equipped geneto-optician control of a patient's brain to the level of the individual neuron, which is much higher fidelity than previous methods as clunky as drugs and electro-shock.

If there's ever been a better reason to learn a little science, nobody has told me it. I can picture the mass-produced versions of this technology already. Infini-boner Bluray orgasm gas: you're one huff away from effortless spastic laser-tantra. Even though you're technically snorting a virus.


No Comments.
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss...
Apr 20
2009

Neuroenhancement

Posted by Chip Dingo in Untagged 

Chip Dingo

There's an interesting new article at the New Yorker on the recent collegiate trend of "neuroenhancer" use. The piece, despite it's balanced presentation, reads a little like a warning of another plague of forthcoming horrible addictions.

 The  numbers are legitimate and spooky enough--some five to 35% of students polled from various universities admit to currently using or having used stimulants like Adderall (mmm... meth) and antinarcoleptics like modafinil to boost their cognitive and attentive capacities for academic gains. Academic sources themselves have pointed out that the community--up to and including your thesis advisor--seem to generally accept the idea.

Noteworthily, there is a positive correlation in the crowd of willing towards accepting and indulging in the odd--or not so odd--hoot. Though it is brushed by in a decidedly numeric fashion, the fact underscores a point that is missed in many discussions of the topic: "enhancement" is a culturally biased idea.


Discuss (4 posts)
Neuroenhancement
Apr 23 2009 09:45:21
I think it's a positive trend; people using drugs that make their brains work better during university are probably making better use of their time there than those who solely use drugs that make their brain work worse, i.e., alcohol.
#10
Re:Neuroenhancement
Apr 29 2009 01:51:53
There was already a dude who tried to get into the Olympics with prosthetic legs and was denied. www.engadget.com/2008/01/17/prosthetic-l...ified-from-olympics/

I think it has always been a risk and reward equation. Does society want athletes who have fantastic accomplishments and then die at the age of 40? The answer has usually been no. But it happens anyway because the rewards far outweigh the risk of being caught and the health risks.

But as you said, if you had the opportunity to be better at your day job with only a slight risk, you would consider it. For most athletes, it's the difference between making a million dollars a year for their entire career, or scoring massive $10 or $20 million salary for the prime of their career. Or between going to the Olympics and winning a gold medal (and a piece of history).

Your point about the term "enhancement" not having objectivity is valid. But if you're running a competition, you come up with a set of rules. And if someone is operating outside of those rules, i.e. by using performance enhancing drugs, then they are cheating. In competition, enhancement does have objectivity. In the academic world, where there are few rules except come up with your own ideas, it's not really as clear cut.
#19
Neuroenhancement
May 02 2009 01:05:47
Thanks for the link, mdshorter, I have no doubt that's the example that was being referred to in the video I saw, which is somewhere on www.ted.com, a site everyone should visit and watch copious amounts of.

Unless, of course, you aren't worried about the imminent cyborg apocalypse.
#22
cOQWSIrsinlsPjxc
Oct 13 2010 10:10:12
th5YFk <a href="ljopfkcgmmav.com/">ljopfkcgmmav</a>, lgjysddjszqx, [link=http://zcsbqiazcxdv.com/]zcsbqiazcxdv[/link], mhfuhgwtrzun.com/
#157

You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss...
VALID CSS   |   VALID XHTML