We're getting a lot of new sign-ups, so I've decided to write a bit about what we hope to achieve content-wise and organizationally here at Hotbox.
First of all, for those new and old alike — welcome to the site! We've done a lot lately to make the software much more usable and have plans to provide multi-platform mobile functionality for content submission in the future. Please bear with us as we work out the few remaining bugs in the system; what we're doing is a little at the edge of our system's capabilities and it's taken some effort to get it to where it is now (Also: Big Thank-You to the JomSocial development team, who recently helped us troubleshoot an issue with our community software).
Here's what we're trying to accomplish. Support for marijuana policy reform is anywhere from 44-60% in favour of decrim/legalization, meaning that it's only a matter of time before the issue reaches supermajority status and keeping the same ludicrous penalties for cultivating a simple plant will appear as insane as it actually is. The liberalization of drug laws in the United States will cause a ripple effect throughout the developed world, insomuch as one of the most ardent supporters of zero-tolerance drug policy will have severely changed its course.
No Comments. You need to login or register to post comments.
This was my second year attending Shambhala and every year gets better and better.
In particular, this time 'round was especially enjoyable as I camped with the rest of the Hotbox editorial staff (Unfortunately excluding CA Editor Xander Harding, who was stuck in Calgary due to work) and knew twice as many people as I did last year. We ran a tight ship up in Camp Hotbox and talked to many of you while there; thanks to everyone who dropped by!
The weekend started out with myself, two friends and Lifestyle Editor Janus Jones (Who disappeared into the woods shortly upon arrival to do god-only-knows-what) heading south from Calgary in my trusty VW Golf, packed to the brim with camping gear. A short six hours and several mashup albums later, we arrived at the entrance to Shambhala and began our way over the rocky trail into the farm. Luckily, there was only a tiny line at the entrance to the site, and after a quick vehicle check, we rolled into the biggest party of the summer.
So, apparently Old Media is dying. The following clip from this week’s Daily Show very enthusiastically discusses some of the difficulties traditional forms of media currently face. More after the jump.
Is Print a dead medium? Much evidence points to that conclusion; between the massive delays caused by a print publishing cycle (Daily newspapers have a lag time of about 12-24 hours; weeklies can have a lag time of up to six days. Magazines are produced months before their shelve date), the enormous costs of producing a print publication and the immense competition provided by newer media, the so-called “Death of Print” seems inevitable. Yet at the same time, there is some irony in the above clip — television faces many of the problems print does without much of its added value.
Really, the driving evolutionary force in media right now is the Internet. That everyone from CNN News anchors to Washington Post columnists are now on Twitter is just one way in which the established media has tried to make use of this new technology (And rather miserably, at that). Blogging and web-based news outlets like the Huffington Post or the Drudge Report have demonstrated how quickly net-based production cycles can produce late-breaking content without a tenth the overhead traditional media requires. Yes, Broadcast media makes the production speed of Print seem incredibly lethargic, but the mere requirement of Broadcast media to occupy time-slots imposes its own inherent lag-time. To overcome this, 24 hour news channels such as CNN have emerged, but even this is slow compared to Internet distribution. What’s more, to realize the continuous feed required for a 24 hour news cycle, much content is repeated over and over, and quite a lot of it is mediocre at best (Ironically, a continually-profitable topic for the Daily Show is the banality its own medium experiences when conducting a continuous news cycle).
Print has, in my mind, some enduring value. You can archive it short-term fairly easily, you can read it in the bath, leave it on your coffee table for bored guests to read, receive it at your doorstep with regularity. The doom and gloom coming from Print media is, in my mind, more due to the fact they’re not able to create value-added content in the way Broadcast is.
Think of how Red Bull does their sports promotions. A decade ago, nobody had heard of Red Bull and their terrible tasting (yet effective) magic elixor, and now their motocross and airplane slalom events are the modern equivalent of the X-Games in the ’90s. Their use of media is a good example of how Broadcast media are in some capacities more suited for new media applications: every event is recorded and the clips are sliced apart, put in ads, posted on YouTube, replayed on sports channels and more. They get a lot of value from their content. While it may be expensive as hell to have giant air-filled plane racing pylons dotting an entire harbour, it becomes a measured investment when one considers Red Bull’s massive ability to reuse content.
Broadcast news agencies also reuse content quite well. To use a Canadian example, the Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC) has both radio and television news endeavours, both of which are reused as web content. However, they also have a team dedicated to writing web content to supplement video content, while other textual content is provided through wire articles. This use of three media in a single conglomeration is the heart of New media — no longer is it acceptable to be merely a newspaper or a radio station or a television station. The norm is now to be all three.
For a time, Print media was able to use the transferability of text to aid in content proliferation on the web. By this I mean you can place text in RSS feeds and have it proliferate via other web applications (Hotbox’s Smokkr.com website is a good example of this in action). Video was really unwieldy and it would take users hours to download a single clip. Now, with Flash-based video streaming sites like YouTube and the proliferation of high-speed Internet access, video is as accessible as text. This means competition between the two media is now as vivid on the Internet as it was in the meatspace a half century ago. But to portray it as such is to really miss the opportunity provided by Internet media — the ability to transcend medium-created barriers and creatively juxtapose related work in a single content frame.
No Comments. You need to login or register to post comments.
Are appalled with what we see as the federal government’s attempt to limit the choice of responsible adults. Bill C-32 is an egregious affront to our personal freedoms and an irrational attempt to control youth smoking for the following reasons:
Fred at The Next Level made me aware of a recent bill that just finished its committee reading in Canadian parliament. If passed, it will have dire reprecussions for the entire Canadian cannabis community.
No Comments. You need to login or register to post comments.
Recent video coming out of the Coachella shows a naked man being forced to the ground for refusing to cooperate with police and put on his clothes, then being tasered — to the booing of a large crowd that had gathered and was filming the entire thing. As the violence escalates, the videographer can be heard saying:
"Freedom of speech, holmes! The world is watching!"
Re:"The Whole World Is Watching" Apr 30 2009 23:49:06
Well I agree that the dude probably deserved to be arrested or at least escorted out of public, there were three fairly large cops surrounding an obviously unarmed man who wasn't exactly throwing fists. I would have expected the cops to be able to cuff him before they resorted to the Tazer (which was used in excess once they had him on the ground).
It also scares the crap out of me that we have to fight big brother with big brother. But I suppose it's the best way at this point. The average person is caught on a camera hundreds of times a day, yet every time they try and identify a criminal on the news all you see is a blurry figure that looks like a million other people.
A positive in this is that generally cell phones come equipped with easy-to-use, fairly high quality camera's which will make it easier to identify authority-gone-wrongers much easier.
It's time to fight surveillance with surveillance, I guess.
Change.org, for the uninitiated, is a project set up by Obama’s team to create online discussion with regards to policy, among other things. One of their biggest initiatives has been to develop a system whereby people can submit questions to be voted on, with the highest-rated ones being answered by the presidential team during a press gallery meeting.
Last round, a question regarding the legalization of cannabis was chosen and the response was… frigid. I’m guessing this is largely because the middle-class will crucify Obama if he even hints at any other policy beyond fixing the economy at this point in the decline, and thus they’re being as mum as possible on social reform projects.
However, partially thanks to the community at everyone’s favourite stoner Chan site, no less than three drug reform-related questions have made it to the final voting round in the second question cycle. Among them:
No Comments. You need to login or register to post comments.
South Australian Parliament member Sandra Kanck has introduced a bill legalizing cannabis for medicinal purposes. Recently, it has come under attack from member A. Bressington in the form of outdated research and invalid reasoning. From the article:
Such manipulation is found in the honourable member’s initial second reading contribution. In a total disregard for the potential consequences of the words, the honourable member told this council and all those who read Hansard that cannabis does not cause schizophrenia but instead is a treatment for this most devastating mental illness.
No Comments. You need to login or register to post comments.
How’re you doing? Feeling a little less stressed yet? I don’t blame you, that electoral race was U-G-L-Y. Like, between the implication that you’re best buds with terrorists and the whole Sarah Palin thing, I can’t blame you if you don’t want to repeat it any time soon.
Or at least for another four years. Ha-ha!
No Comments. You need to login or register to post comments.